![Windows 2000 Hard Drive Size Windows 2000 Hard Drive Size](http://www.windows2000.windowsreinstall.com/installnewhdd/Image14.jpg)
For Windows 2000 Professional using NTFS — Must All partitions be NTFS or can a FAT32 partition be functional as well? Windows 2000 Professional as long as other Windows 2000 and XP family operating systems have full support for FAT32 and FAT16 file systems, as long as CDFS, HPFS, etc. Probleme hard disk size divide by 2 under Win 2000 server Hello i have a SC430 with two disks (250Gb) under windows 2000 server, i have two disks but the size is 130Gb, if someone can help me? Windows 2000 server service pack 4, all update is do!!
Similar help and support threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hard disk showed uninitialized and incorrect size Hello all My 2TB WD hard disk is showing uninitialized and the disk size turned to 128PB after I forced restarting it.:cry: I have tried DiskGenius or Partition Table Doctor but they cannot locate the partition. | Hardware & Devices | |||
Windows reporting incorrect drive size attached to NAS adapter I am new here and wasn't sure where I should post this as I can see it applying to multiple categories. I have two NAS storage adapters, both are CiragoLink+NUS2000 Devices. Each unit accommodates 4 USB hard drives up to 2 terabytes per attached drive. On both devices I have attached Western... | Hardware & Devices | |||
HHD Size Reporting Differences I recently merged a small 'D: restore' partition (old Vista OS backup) into C: (now one partition). I would now like to recreate a D partition for data but I noticed that my HHD size as reported from Disk Management is 465GB, which differs from Explorer and OEM 500GB cap. In Explorer properties,... | Performance & Maintenance | |||
HD drive reporting error, management says one size, windows says.. Hi all, great forum, hope you can help with this, I have searched to no avail... Computer management reports 298 Gb, but it shows up as 137 Gb in an explorer window. Not a CS major here, but I'm thinking the BIOS is off the hook based on these screen captures. For what its worth, I am pretty... | Hardware & Devices | |||
Reporting an incorrect update How do I tell MS that their optional update is wrong? :o My home made Windows 7 Home Premium machine upgraded from XP PRO was running great until I installed an optional upgrade - for ATI HD 2600 (installed on my PC) as listed on the Windows update site. Restarting the PC failed. A DOS screen... | Windows Updates & Activation |
The internal SATA hard drives have a limit on a lot of motherboards of 2TB and if I want to get a 3TB HDD then I need to connect it using a PCI card (or get a new motherboard).
But I wanted to ask: If I connect a 3TB harddrive to a external USB enclosure, will it work?The Vantec enclosure I want to buy says it supports up to 3TB HDD but I want to make sure.
KarimKarim
3 Answers
I realize that this question was asked two years ago, but I don't think any of the answers here are complete, so I'm going to give it a shot anyway.
To answer the subject line, USB's limit is the limit of its mass-storage class (MSC) spec. This spec is in turn based on the SCSI transparent command set. (See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_mass_storage_device_class#Device_access). Looking at the SCSI read commands (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCSI_Read_Commands#Read_.286.29) you can see that there are several versions of the API. The oldest supports 21-bit block addresses (and a 1GiB limit), a later version supports 32-bit LBAs (imposing the 2TiB limit many cases have today), and the latest has a 64-bit LBA which will impose an 8ZiB limit (that's 8 giga-terabytes!).
Modern USB cases will support 64-bit LBAs and should support any drive you're likely to find. Older cases won't support this and will misbehave if they are attached to a drive larger than 2TiB.
Assuming your USB case supports the drive, then there's the issue of partitioning the drive. The MBR partition scheme (used in various forms since MS-DOS) uses a 32-bit block index. So it has a limit of 2TiB. The solution used today is to switch to the GUID partition table (GPT) format which uses 64-bit block numbers.
All modern operating systems (including Windows, Mac OS X and Linux) support GUID partition tables and should be able to support a >2TiB drive as a data disc.
If you're a Mac or Linux user, then you should be able to boot from the drive as well. Macs have EFI firmware and support booting GPT volumes. Modern Linux systems have code in the GRUB bootloader that, I'm told, will allow booting Linux from a GUID drive without EFI firmware..
If you're running Windows, however, you may or may not be able to boot from the drive. You will need EFI firmware on your motherboard, and you will need to be running a 64-bit version of Windows. Microsoft requires both in order to boot from a GPT drive of any size. This means that if you are running 32-bit Windows or have BIOS-only firmware (without EFI), you will want to make sure your boot disk is 2TiB or smaller, so you can apply an MBR partition.
David C.David C.
It will really come down to your motherboard, but most of the issues you are worried about relate to directly-connected SATA drives, which use a SATA driver, not a USB driver as in your case. These SATA issues are being addressed in newer motherboards.
Doing a search, I could not find one person, who had problems with a 3TB external drive, but of course, I cannot say 100% since I do not have your specific hardware to test. This is interesting as a general paper (Note number 10, which is directly relevant to your question).
You might want to create a couple of partitions <2TB, or you can create GPT partitions >2TB. Select the largest block size you can when formatting, as there are known issues with some programs, like Windows Backup and small block sizes. With that much space, you may lose a little, but not much relatively speaking.
KCotreauKCotreau
The 2TB issue is mainly with computers that need to boot from a large drive as the BIOS has problems understanding them. Even without a card or extra addon, using a standard lower drive for boot and a 2+TB drive for data works fine (at least the few times I have tried).
USB to SATA enclosures usually just emulate a hard drive controller. Some of the older ones were very rough and had a few issues, but with any recent one, I don't think you will have any issues what so ever.
William HilsumWilliam Hilsum